La chaîne d'options affiche les données clés des options sur actions de China SXT Pharmaceuticals à différents prix d'exercice et dates d'expiration. Les traders utilisent ces informations pour analyser les transactions potentielles et évaluer le sentiment du marché pour China SXT Pharmaceuticals..

China SXT Pharmaceuticals (NASDAQ:SXTC) Stock, Chaîne d'Options

China SXT Pharmaceuticals Inc is a pharmaceutical company that is focused on the research, development, manufacture, marketing, and sales of Traditional Chinese Medicine Pieces (TCMP), particularly, TCMP (Directed-oral TCMP, and After-soaking TCMP) which is a sort of Traditional Chinese Medicine (TCM) that has been processed to be ready for use without decoction. Geographically, the firm generates its revenue from the People's Republic of China.

China SXT Pharmaceuticals, Inc. - Common Stock

China SXT Pharmaceuticals Inc

Mizuho analyst David Bellinger maintains Five Below (NASDAQ:<a class="ticker" href="https://www.benzinga.com/stock/FIVE#NASDAQ">FIVE</a>) with a Neutral and raises the price target from $100 to $115.

News

Price Target

Analyst Ratings

FIVE

Mizuho Maintains Neutral on Five Below, Raises Price Target to $115

Roth Capital analyst Boobalan Pachaiyappan initiates coverage on PolyPid (NASDAQ:<a class="ticker" href="https://www.benzinga.com/stock/PYPD#NASDAQ">PYPD</a>) with a Buy rating and announces Price Target of $9.

Initiation

PYPD

Roth Capital Initiates Coverage On PolyPid with Buy Rating, Announces Price Target of $9

WYNN

Wynn Expands Middle East And European Presence With Mayfair Casino Ahead of UAE Resort Opening in 2027

Apple Inc (NASDAQ:<a class="ticker" href="https://www.benzinga.com/stock/AAPL#NASDAQ">AAPL</a>) may still be iconic, but its stock is no longer invincible. Since peaking against <a href="https://www.benzinga.com/topic/magnificent-seven">the Magnificent 7</a> in late 2022, Apple's relative performance has plunged over 45%, a jaw-dropping fall that underlines how far the tech giant has lagged behind its Big Tech peers.
<figure class="wp-block-image size-large"><img loading="lazy" decoding="async" width="1024" height="592" src="https://editorial-assets.benzinga.com/wp-content/uploads/2025/06/05104834/Screenshot-2025-06-05-at-7.36.24-PM-1024x592.png" alt="" class="wp-image-939935" srcset="https://editorial-assets.benzinga.com/wp-content/uploads/2025/06/05104834/Screenshot-2025-06-05-at-7.36.24-PM-1024x592.png 1024w,https://editorial-assets.benzinga.com/wp-content/uploads/2025/06/05104834/Screenshot-2025-06-05-at-7.36.24-PM-300x174.png 300w,https://editorial-assets.benzinga.com/wp-content/uploads/2025/06/05104834/Screenshot-2025-06-05-at-7.36.24-PM-768x444.png 768w,https://editorial-assets.benzinga.com/wp-content/uploads/2025/06/05104834/Screenshot-2025-06-05-at-7.36.24-PM.png 1134w" sizes="(max-width: 1024px) 100vw, 1024px" /></figure>
Chart created using TradingView
A price ratio chart comparing Apple to the aggregate Mag 7 soared to 0.17 in November 2022. Fast forward to June 2025, and that figure has collapsed to 0.09. While the broader Mag 7 group has powered ahead on AI momentum, Apple has been on a different trajectory — down 17% year-to-date and struggling to reclaim its former leadership.
Read Also: <a href="https://www.benzinga.com/news/topics/25/06/45790909/was-jeff-bezos-backed-whylabs-secretly-acquired-by-apple-after-10m-series-a-to-compete-in-ai-arms-race-against-google-openai-and-microsoft">Was Jeff Bezos-Backed WhyLabs Secretly Acquired By Apple After $10M Series A To Compete In AI Arms Race Against Google, OpenAI, And Microsoft?</a>
<h1 class="wp-block-heading">Tariffs, Tech Turmoil &amp; iPhone Woes</h1>
The biggest culprit? Geopolitics. 
Apple's reliance on Chinese manufacturing has put it squarely in the crosshairs of Trump-era tariffs. A <a href="https://www.benzinga.com/content/45653187/apple-sinks-after-new-25-tariff-announcement-whats-the-bottom">recent 25% tariff</a> threat on non-U.S.-made iPhones shaved billions off Apple's market cap overnight, exposing the company&#8217;s supply chain vulnerabilities. While <a href="https://in.benzinga.com/markets/equities/25/05/45637672/apple-ramps-up-india-manufacturing-as-us-iphone-imports-surge-76-in-april-while-shipments-from-china-plunge">production shifts to India</a> may soften the blow, they come with time and cost.
Add to that broader market weakness — interest rate uncertainty, stretched valuations and flagging iPhone enthusiasm —and you've got a recipe for underperformance.
AAPL stock has been the worst-performing Mag 7 stock in 2025, shedding momentum as investors rotate toward names more plugged into the AI boom.
<h1 class="wp-block-heading">Is Services Growth Enough To Offset Hardware Drag?</h1>
There's still one bright spot: services. Apple's services division posted $26.3 billion in first quarter revenue with 75% margins, offering a strong buffer against hardware volatility. Analysts project this segment could reach $180 billion by 2030, helping to shift Apple's growth narrative from devices to recurring revenue.
Still, the question remains whether services growth is enough to counter declining iPhone excitement and regulatory pressures. With competitors such as Samsung, Huawei and Alphabet Inc (NASDAQ:<a class="ticker" href="https://www.benzinga.com/stock/GOOGL#NASDAQ">GOOGL</a>) (NASDAQ:<a class="ticker" href="https://www.benzinga.com/stock/GOOG#NASDAQ">GOOG</a>) accelerating innovation, Apple's path forward will require more than just ecosystem loyalty — it'll need breakthroughs that reignite investor confidence.
Read Next: 
<ul class="wp-block-list">
<li><a href="https://www.benzinga.com/markets/asia/25/06/45787934/apple-and-alibabas-ai-launch-in-china-delayed-by-us-china-trade-tensions-and-regulatory-hurdles-report">Apple And Alibaba&#8217;s AI Launch In China Delayed By US-China Trade Tensions And Regulatory Hurdles: Report</a></li>
</ul>
Photo: hanohiki via Shutterstock.com

Long Ideas

Tech

Trading Ideas

AAPL

GOOG

GOOGL

Apple Has Plummeted A Stunning 45% Vs. Mag 7 Since 2022

Mizuho analyst Dan Dolev upgrades Visa (NYSE:<a class="ticker" href="https://www.benzinga.com/stock/V#NYSE">V</a>) from Neutral to Outperform and raises the price target from $359 to $425.

Upgrades

Mizuho Upgrades Visa to Outperform, Raises Price Target to $425

<a href="https://www.kansascityfed.org/pdf/article/articlepage/15623/">https://www.kansascityfed.org/pdf/article/articlepage/15623/</a>

Politics

Economics

Federal Reserve

General

Fed's Schmid Says Expect Tariffs To Start To Show Through To Prices In Coming Months; Extent Of Tariff-driven Price Push Won't Be Fully Apparent For Some Time; Extent Of Tariffs' Drag On Growth, Employment Also Unclear

Mizuho analyst Vijay Rakesh maintains Micron Technology (NASDAQ:<a class="ticker" href="https://www.benzinga.com/stock/MU#NASDAQ">MU</a>) with a Outperform and raises the price target from $124 to $130.

Mizuho Maintains Outperform on Micron Technology, Raises Price Target to $130

Fed's Schmid Says Uncomfortable With Look-through Policy Approach To Tariff-Driven Price Increase;  Fed Policy Needs To Be 'Nimble' To Balance Two Sides Of Mandate; Focused On Maintaining Fed's Credibility On Inflation; Optimistic That Economic Activity Can Be Sustained

<ul>
<li>Board adopts cryptocurrency reserve policy as part of treasury diversification</li>
<li>Bitcoin Bourbon&#x2122; pre-launch and giveaway contest unveiled</li>
<li>FinTech veteran Matt Swann appointed to Board of Directors</li>
<li>Redefines CPG Sector to "Crypto Product Goods"</li>
</ul>
GIG HARBOR, Wash., June 05, 2025 (GLOBE NEWSWIRE) -- <a href="https://www.globenewswire.com/Tracker?data=pKMLg10mxKY2ZzpGLGSIBs4Fx_TK2RmTBg_hTcc5F5S-4dfdGG0OXES0zhPR1wRc1812jwZhkNqebEqqpWjt-9F-AJ0WoCEKw5eCtiE4jF4Gs0RX-2M9m-LArKr1OGXtnCNuqXWOTQK2QS9HqwiGvQ==">Heritage Distilling Holding Company, Inc.</a> (NASDAQ:<a class="ticker" href="https://www.benzinga.com/stock/CASK#NASDAQ">CASK</a>), North America's most awarded craft distillery, is pioneering a new category: Crypto Product Goods (CPG). This marks a shift from traditional consumer packaged goods to products built around blockchain technologies and cryptocurrency integration, making Heritage the first craft spirits company to accept crypto as a form of payment for spirits.
Cryptocurrency Treasury Reserve Policy Adopted The Company recently adopted a <a href="https://www.globenewswire.com/Tracker?data=gwhyvYTU5g9gS2t96McK5Djy6p7lIDV-PJY21nvK2EtJh1BnHAJzd5mK4eBUJgXZ_pTTBhR_N-Z7Ft6Fxw2w9w1NOA-BjjpkfMHqHCT0veDZ6pAC7EYupfhbtZp-8X0wSx4q12Vhc4Nx7z0mVG7PYbgzJHWJ1abE-ghlwfj-R3vptB1DsCrbUNxt_biDpE5OruRU90ihgYNDSDPwOwYAbPD8dMApeVn7SeinrvI3NoFmRJAqvTzdKqOE3HhnpKwj-3pbb5IkWrGLTE0Kca4a8dTpx0wP7AB87y_ffycXNYH589ptfkno5VhKbm3lQIYllDNEZ-PbKIkoFGPwkZyTyg==">Cryptocurrency Treasury Reserve Policy</a> as part of a broader strategy to diversify corporate sales and treasury operations. As a first step, the Company is preparing the pre-launch of its <a href="https://www.globenewswire.com/Tracker?data=nONPEHnrrxmuFcVPhlLpOUGe0sRvm5wVojzg-iwPlfCE1C-bb7oVM_9ocfL3Pq8qbd4AHnuClVLulNBYU4foOnTAmXMyKN73SWdUjg_NU4FtAjb6cJI0BnOidFWY8yYk">Bitcoin Bourbon</a>&#x2122;, which customers will be able to purchase using Bitcoin.
Heritage is also exploring crypto payments across its supply chain, beginning with Canadian suppliers, as it refines its blockchain protocols and infrastructure.
Looking Ahead With fewer than 125 public companies adopting crypto treasury strategies, Heritage stands out as a forward-thinking leader in both spirits and digital finance. The implementation of its cryptocurrency reserve policy marks the beginning stages of multi-stage initiative to&nbsp;ensure regulatory compliance while evolving as a crypto-enabled ecommerce brand. Company plans to unveil additional crypto-aligned products and partnerships in the months ahead.

CASK

Heritage Distilling Holding Board Adopts Cryptocurrency Reserve Policy As Part Of Treasury Diversification; Redefines CPG Sector To "Crypto Product Goods"

Morgan Stanley analyst Judah Frommer maintains Blueprint Medicines (NASDAQ:<a class="ticker" href="https://www.benzinga.com/stock/BPMC#NASDAQ">BPMC</a>) with a Equal-Weight and raises the price target from $102 to $129.

BPMC

Morgan Stanley Maintains Equal-Weight on Blueprint Medicines, Raises Price Target to $129

Morgan Stanley analyst Erik Woodring reiterates Apple (NASDAQ:<a class="ticker" href="https://www.benzinga.com/stock/AAPL#NASDAQ">AAPL</a>) with a Overweight and maintains $235 price target.

Reiteration

Morgan Stanley Reiterates Overweight on Apple, Maintains $235 Price Target

Morgan Stanley analyst Simeon Gutman maintains Five Below (NASDAQ:<a class="ticker" href="https://www.benzinga.com/stock/FIVE#NASDAQ">FIVE</a>) with a Equal-Weight and raises the price target from $110 to $135.

Morgan Stanley Maintains Equal-Weight on Five Below, Raises Price Target to $135

<a href="https://www.philadelphiafed.org/the-economy/monetary-policy/250605-economic-outlook-and-final-thoughts">https://www.philadelphiafed.org/the-economy/monetary-policy/250605-economic-outlook-and-final-thoughts</a>

Fed's Harker Says Hard Data Have Remained Robust; Thus Far Job Market Has Been Mostly Stable; Economy Faces Many Different Possible Paths; Fed Independence Is Critical To Maintain

Morgan Stanley analyst Elizabeth Porter maintains Sprinklr (NYSE:<a class="ticker" href="https://www.benzinga.com/stock/CXM#NYSE">CXM</a>) with a Equal-Weight and raises the price target from $8 to $10.

Morgan Stanley Maintains Equal-Weight on Sprinklr, Raises Price Target to $10

This whale alert can help traders discover the next big trading opportunities.
Whales are entities with large sums of money and we track their transactions here at Benzinga on our options activity scanner.
Traders will search for circumstances when the market estimation of an option diverges heavily from its normal worth. High amounts of trading activity could push option prices to exaggerated or underestimated levels. 
Here's the list of options activity happening in today's session: 
<table>
<thead>
<tr>
<th>Symbol</th>
<th>PUT/CALL</th>
<th>Trade Type</th>
<th>Sentiment</th>
<th>Exp. Date</th>
<th>Strike Price</th>
<th>Total Trade Price</th>
<th>Open Interest</th>
<th>Volume</th>
</tr>
</thead>
<tbody>
<tr>
<td>HOOD</td>
<td>CALL</td>
<td>TRADE</td>
<td>BEARISH</td>
<td>06/13/25</td>
<td>$75.00</td>
<td>$32.6K</td>
<td>7.0K</td>
<td>16.1K</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>BAC</td>
<td>CALL</td>
<td>SWEEP</td>
<td>BEARISH</td>
<td>06/20/25</td>
<td>$45.50</td>
<td>$77.5K</td>
<td>1.9K</td>
<td>10.0K</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>ETOR</td>
<td>CALL</td>
<td>SWEEP</td>
<td>BEARISH</td>
<td>10/17/25</td>
<td>$75.00</td>
<td>$39.0K</td>
<td>5</td>
<td>1.0K</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>JPM</td>
<td>PUT</td>
<td>SWEEP</td>
<td>BEARISH</td>
<td>06/06/25</td>
<td>$262.50</td>
<td>$30.3K</td>
<td>742</td>
<td>614</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>FUTU</td>
<td>PUT</td>
<td>TRADE</td>
<td>BEARISH</td>
<td>09/19/25</td>
<td>$85.00</td>
<td>$65.0K</td>
<td>113</td>
<td>208</td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>

<h2>Explanation</h2>
These itemized elaborations have been created using the accompanying table. 
• For HOOD (NASDAQ:<a class="ticker" href="https://www.benzinga.com/stock/HOOD#NASDAQ">HOOD</a>), we notice a call option trade that happens to be bearish, expiring in 8 day(s) on June 13, 2025. This event was a transfer of 99 contract(s) at a $75.00 strike. The total cost received by the writing party (or parties) was $32.6K, with a price of $330.0 per contract. There were 7056 open contracts at this strike prior to today, and today 16188 contract(s) were bought and sold. 
• Regarding BAC (NYSE:<a class="ticker" href="https://www.benzinga.com/stock/BAC#NYSE">BAC</a>), we observe a call option sweep with bearish sentiment. It expires in 15 day(s) on June 20, 2025. Parties traded 2501 contract(s) at a $45.50 strike. This particular call needed to be split into 19 different trades to become filled. The total cost received by the writing party (or parties) was $77.5K, with a price of $31.0 per contract. There were 1978 open contracts at this strike prior to today, and today 10083 contract(s) were bought and sold. 
• For ETOR (NASDAQ:<a class="ticker" href="https://www.benzinga.com/stock/ETOR#NASDAQ">ETOR</a>), we notice a call option sweep that happens to be bearish, expiring in 134 day(s) on October 17, 2025. This event was a transfer of 40 contract(s) at a $75.00 strike. This particular call needed to be split into 3 different trades to become filled. The total cost received by the writing party (or parties) was $39.0K, with a price of $975.0 per contract. There were 5 open contracts at this strike prior to today, and today 1023 contract(s) were bought and sold. 
• For JPM (NYSE:<a class="ticker" href="https://www.benzinga.com/stock/JPM#NYSE">JPM</a>), we notice a put option sweep that happens to be bearish, expiring in 1 day(s) on June 6, 2025. This event was a transfer of 300 contract(s) at a $262.50 strike. This particular put needed to be split into 30 different trades to become filled. The total cost received by the writing party (or parties) was $30.3K, with a price of $101.0 per contract. There were 742 open contracts at this strike prior to today, and today 614 contract(s) were bought and sold. 
• Regarding FUTU (NASDAQ:<a class="ticker" href="https://www.benzinga.com/stock/FUTU#NASDAQ">FUTU</a>), we observe a put option trade with bearish sentiment. It expires in 106 day(s) on September 19, 2025. Parties traded 200 contract(s) at a $85.00 strike. The total cost received by the writing party (or parties) was $65.0K, with a price of $325.0 per contract. There were 113 open contracts at this strike prior to today, and today 208 contract(s) were bought and sold. 
Options Alert Terminology 
 - Call Contracts: The right to buy shares as indicated in the contract. 
 - Put Contracts: The right to sell shares as indicated in the contract. 
 - Expiration Date: When the contract expires. One must act on the contract by this date if one wants to use it. 
 - Premium/Option Price: The price of the contract. 
For more information, visit our <a href="https://pro.benzinga.com/blog/how-to-understand-option-alerts/">Guide to Understanding Options Alerts</a> or read <a href="https://www.benzinga.com/markets/options">more about unusual options activity</a>. 
This article was generated by Benzinga's automated content engine and reviewed by an editor.

Options

ETOR

FUTU

HOOD

5 Financials Stocks With Whale Alerts In Today's Session

This whale alert can help traders discover the next big trading opportunities.
Whales are entities with large sums of money and we track their transactions here at Benzinga on our options activity scanner.
Traders will search for circumstances when the market estimation of an option diverges heavily from its normal worth. High amounts of trading activity could push option prices to exaggerated or underestimated levels. 
Here's the list of options activity happening in today's session: 
<table>
<thead>
<tr>
<th>Symbol</th>
<th>PUT/CALL</th>
<th>Trade Type</th>
<th>Sentiment</th>
<th>Exp. Date</th>
<th>Strike Price</th>
<th>Total Trade Price</th>
<th>Open Interest</th>
<th>Volume</th>
</tr>
</thead>
<tbody>
<tr>
<td>TSLA</td>
<td>PUT</td>
<td>SWEEP</td>
<td>BULLISH</td>
<td>06/06/25</td>
<td>$300.00</td>
<td>$50.4K</td>
<td>15.2K</td>
<td>166.7K</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>BYON</td>
<td>PUT</td>
<td>TRADE</td>
<td>BEARISH</td>
<td>01/15/27</td>
<td>$5.00</td>
<td>$39.0K</td>
<td>993</td>
<td>825</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>DASH</td>
<td>CALL</td>
<td>TRADE</td>
<td>BEARISH</td>
<td>06/13/25</td>
<td>$217.50</td>
<td>$29.2K</td>
<td>95</td>
<td>513</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>GME</td>
<td>PUT</td>
<td>TRADE</td>
<td>BEARISH</td>
<td>01/16/26</td>
<td>$120.00</td>
<td>$90.3K</td>
<td>3.2K</td>
<td>430</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>CMG</td>
<td>CALL</td>
<td>TRADE</td>
<td>BULLISH</td>
<td>09/19/25</td>
<td>$50.00</td>
<td>$91.5K</td>
<td>10.4K</td>
<td>421</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>BURL</td>
<td>PUT</td>
<td>TRADE</td>
<td>BEARISH</td>
<td>07/18/25</td>
<td>$230.00</td>
<td>$40.8K</td>
<td>61</td>
<td>82</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>CVNA</td>
<td>CALL</td>
<td>TRADE</td>
<td>NEUTRAL</td>
<td>01/15/27</td>
<td>$370.00</td>
<td>$53.6K</td>
<td>418</td>
<td>14</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>BKNG</td>
<td>CALL</td>
<td>TRADE</td>
<td>BULLISH</td>
<td>09/19/25</td>
<td>$5200.00</td>
<td>$62.4K</td>
<td>59</td>
<td>4</td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>

<h2>Explanation</h2>
These bullet-by-bullet explanations have been constructed using the accompanying table. 
• For TSLA (NASDAQ:<a class="ticker" href="https://www.benzinga.com/stock/TSLA#NASDAQ">TSLA</a>), we notice a put option sweep that happens to be bullish, expiring in 1 day(s) on June 6, 2025. This event was a transfer of 106 contract(s) at a $300.00 strike. This particular put needed to be split into 6 different trades to become filled. The total cost received by the writing party (or parties) was $50.4K, with a price of $477.0 per contract. There were 15201 open contracts at this strike prior to today, and today 166760 contract(s) were bought and sold. 
• For BYON (NYSE:<a class="ticker" href="https://www.benzinga.com/stock/BYON#NYSE">BYON</a>), we notice a put option trade that happens to be bearish, expiring in 589 day(s) on January 15, 2027. This event was a transfer of 200 contract(s) at a $5.00 strike. The total cost received by the writing party (or parties) was $39.0K, with a price of $195.0 per contract. There were 993 open contracts at this strike prior to today, and today 825 contract(s) were bought and sold. 
• For DASH (NASDAQ:<a class="ticker" href="https://www.benzinga.com/stock/DASH#NASDAQ">DASH</a>), we notice a call option trade that happens to be bearish, expiring in 8 day(s) on June 13, 2025. This event was a transfer of 75 contract(s) at a $217.50 strike. The total cost received by the writing party (or parties) was $29.2K, with a price of $390.0 per contract. There were 95 open contracts at this strike prior to today, and today 513 contract(s) were bought and sold. 
• For GME (NYSE:<a class="ticker" href="https://www.benzinga.com/stock/GME#NYSE">GME</a>), we notice a put option trade that happens to be bearish, expiring in 225 day(s) on January 16, 2026. This event was a transfer of 10 contract(s) at a $120.00 strike. The total cost received by the writing party (or parties) was $90.3K, with a price of $9030.0 per contract. There were 3286 open contracts at this strike prior to today, and today 430 contract(s) were bought and sold. 
• For CMG (NYSE:<a class="ticker" href="https://www.benzinga.com/stock/CMG#NYSE">CMG</a>), we notice a call option trade that happens to be bullish, expiring in 106 day(s) on September 19, 2025. This event was a transfer of 150 contract(s) at a $50.00 strike. The total cost received by the writing party (or parties) was $91.5K, with a price of $610.0 per contract. There were 10437 open contracts at this strike prior to today, and today 421 contract(s) were bought and sold. 
• For BURL (NYSE:<a class="ticker" href="https://www.benzinga.com/stock/BURL#NYSE">BURL</a>), we notice a put option trade that happens to be bearish, expiring in 43 day(s) on July 18, 2025. This event was a transfer of 73 contract(s) at a $230.00 strike. The total cost received by the writing party (or parties) was $40.8K, with a price of $560.0 per contract. There were 61 open contracts at this strike prior to today, and today 82 contract(s) were bought and sold. 
• For CVNA (NYSE:<a class="ticker" href="https://www.benzinga.com/stock/CVNA#NYSE">CVNA</a>), we notice a call option trade that happens to be neutral, expiring in 589 day(s) on January 15, 2027. This event was a transfer of 5 contract(s) at a $370.00 strike. The total cost received by the writing party (or parties) was $53.6K, with a price of $10739.0 per contract. There were 418 open contracts at this strike prior to today, and today 14 contract(s) were bought and sold. 
• For BKNG (NASDAQ:<a class="ticker" href="https://www.benzinga.com/stock/BKNG#NASDAQ">BKNG</a>), we notice a call option trade that happens to be bullish, expiring in 106 day(s) on September 19, 2025. This event was a transfer of 1 contract(s) at a $5200.00 strike. The total cost received by the writing party (or parties) was $62.4K, with a price of $62470.0 per contract. There were 59 open contracts at this strike prior to today, and today 4 contract(s) were bought and sold. 
Options Alert Terminology 
 - Call Contracts: The right to buy shares as indicated in the contract. 
 - Put Contracts: The right to sell shares as indicated in the contract. 
 - Expiration Date: When the contract expires. One must act on the contract by this date if one wants to use it. 
 - Premium/Option Price: The price of the contract. 
For more information, visit our <a href="https://pro.benzinga.com/blog/how-to-understand-option-alerts/">Guide to Understanding Options Alerts</a> or read <a href="https://www.benzinga.com/markets/options">more news on unusual options activity</a>. 
This article was generated by Benzinga's automated content engine and reviewed by an editor.

BKNG

BURL

BYON

CVNA

DASH

TSLA

8 Consumer Discretionary Stocks Whale Activity In Today's Session

This whale alert can help traders discover the next big trading opportunities.
Whales are entities with large sums of money and we track their transactions here at Benzinga on our options activity scanner.
Traders will search for circumstances when the market estimation of an option diverges heavily from its normal worth. High amounts of trading activity could push option prices to exaggerated or underestimated levels. 
Below are some instances of options activity happening in the Information Technology sector: 
<table>
<thead>
<tr>
<th>Symbol</th>
<th>PUT/CALL</th>
<th>Trade Type</th>
<th>Sentiment</th>
<th>Exp. Date</th>
<th>Strike Price</th>
<th>Total Trade Price</th>
<th>Open Interest</th>
<th>Volume</th>
</tr>
</thead>
<tbody>
<tr>
<td>NVDA</td>
<td>CALL</td>
<td>SWEEP</td>
<td>NEUTRAL</td>
<td>06/06/25</td>
<td>$142.00</td>
<td>$27.9K</td>
<td>47.1K</td>
<td>85.0K</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>CRWV</td>
<td>PUT</td>
<td>SWEEP</td>
<td>BEARISH</td>
<td>06/06/25</td>
<td>$140.00</td>
<td>$68.0K</td>
<td>9.6K</td>
<td>25.1K</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>PLTR</td>
<td>PUT</td>
<td>TRADE</td>
<td>BULLISH</td>
<td>06/06/25</td>
<td>$120.00</td>
<td>$32.4K</td>
<td>10.1K</td>
<td>21.0K</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>FSLR</td>
<td>CALL</td>
<td>TRADE</td>
<td>BEARISH</td>
<td>06/13/25</td>
<td>$175.00</td>
<td>$30.3K</td>
<td>587</td>
<td>8.7K</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>MSTR</td>
<td>CALL</td>
<td>SWEEP</td>
<td>BULLISH</td>
<td>06/06/25</td>
<td>$380.00</td>
<td>$25.2K</td>
<td>12.3K</td>
<td>7.3K</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>AAPL</td>
<td>CALL</td>
<td>TRADE</td>
<td>BEARISH</td>
<td>06/06/25</td>
<td>$200.00</td>
<td>$57.5K</td>
<td>15.6K</td>
<td>5.8K</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>WULF</td>
<td>CALL</td>
<td>SWEEP</td>
<td>BEARISH</td>
<td>06/20/25</td>
<td>$4.50</td>
<td>$31.9K</td>
<td>13.3K</td>
<td>5.6K</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>PSTG</td>
<td>CALL</td>
<td>SWEEP</td>
<td>BEARISH</td>
<td>06/20/25</td>
<td>$55.00</td>
<td>$37.5K</td>
<td>5.2K</td>
<td>4.1K</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>MU</td>
<td>PUT</td>
<td>SWEEP</td>
<td>BULLISH</td>
<td>07/18/25</td>
<td>$110.00</td>
<td>$33.4K</td>
<td>6.9K</td>
<td>2.7K</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>AVGO</td>
<td>CALL</td>
<td>SWEEP</td>
<td>BULLISH</td>
<td>06/20/25</td>
<td>$290.00</td>
<td>$89.9K</td>
<td>2.8K</td>
<td>2.7K</td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>

<h2>Explanation</h2>
These itemized elaborations have been created using the accompanying table. 
• For NVDA (NASDAQ:<a class="ticker" href="https://www.benzinga.com/stock/NVDA#NASDAQ">NVDA</a>), we notice a call option sweep that happens to be neutral, expiring in 1 day(s) on June 6, 2025. This event was a transfer of 220 contract(s) at a $142.00 strike. This particular call needed to be split into 5 different trades to become filled. The total cost received by the writing party (or parties) was $27.9K, with a price of $126.0 per contract. There were 47138 open contracts at this strike prior to today, and today 85039 contract(s) were bought and sold. 
• Regarding CRWV (NASDAQ:<a class="ticker" href="https://www.benzinga.com/stock/CRWV#NASDAQ">CRWV</a>), we observe a put option sweep with bearish sentiment. It expires in 1 day(s) on June 6, 2025. Parties traded 100 contract(s) at a $140.00 strike. This particular put needed to be split into 3 different trades to become filled. The total cost received by the writing party (or parties) was $68.0K, with a price of $680.0 per contract. There were 9601 open contracts at this strike prior to today, and today 25161 contract(s) were bought and sold. 
• Regarding PLTR (NASDAQ:<a class="ticker" href="https://www.benzinga.com/stock/PLTR#NASDAQ">PLTR</a>), we observe a put option trade with bullish sentiment. It expires in 1 day(s) on June 6, 2025. Parties traded 200 contract(s) at a $120.00 strike. The total cost received by the writing party (or parties) was $32.4K, with a price of $162.0 per contract. There were 10131 open contracts at this strike prior to today, and today 21036 contract(s) were bought and sold. 
• Regarding FSLR (NASDAQ:<a class="ticker" href="https://www.benzinga.com/stock/FSLR#NASDAQ">FSLR</a>), we observe a call option trade with bearish sentiment. It expires in 8 day(s) on June 13, 2025. Parties traded 101 contract(s) at a $175.00 strike. The total cost received by the writing party (or parties) was $30.3K, with a price of $300.0 per contract. There were 587 open contracts at this strike prior to today, and today 8711 contract(s) were bought and sold. 
• For MSTR (NASDAQ:<a class="ticker" href="https://www.benzinga.com/stock/MSTR#NASDAQ">MSTR</a>), we notice a call option sweep that happens to be bullish, expiring in 1 day(s) on June 6, 2025. This event was a transfer of 79 contract(s) at a $380.00 strike. This particular call needed to be split into 3 different trades to become filled. The total cost received by the writing party (or parties) was $25.2K, with a price of $320.0 per contract. There were 12335 open contracts at this strike prior to today, and today 7376 contract(s) were bought and sold. 
• For AAPL (NASDAQ:<a class="ticker" href="https://www.benzinga.com/stock/AAPL#NASDAQ">AAPL</a>), we notice a call option trade that happens to be bearish, expiring in 1 day(s) on June 6, 2025. This event was a transfer of 197 contract(s) at a $200.00 strike. The total cost received by the writing party (or parties) was $57.5K, with a price of $292.0 per contract. There were 15606 open contracts at this strike prior to today, and today 5880 contract(s) were bought and sold. 
• Regarding WULF (NASDAQ:<a class="ticker" href="https://www.benzinga.com/stock/WULF#NASDAQ">WULF</a>), we observe a call option sweep with bearish sentiment. It expires in 15 day(s) on June 20, 2025. Parties traded 2130 contract(s) at a $4.50 strike. This particular call needed to be split into 16 different trades to become filled. The total cost received by the writing party (or parties) was $31.9K, with a price of $15.0 per contract. There were 13398 open contracts at this strike prior to today, and today 5679 contract(s) were bought and sold. 
• For PSTG (NYSE:<a class="ticker" href="https://www.benzinga.com/stock/PSTG#NYSE">PSTG</a>), we notice a call option sweep that happens to be bearish, expiring in 15 day(s) on June 20, 2025. This event was a transfer of 250 contract(s) at a $55.00 strike. This particular call needed to be split into 8 different trades to become filled. The total cost received by the writing party (or parties) was $37.5K, with a price of $150.0 per contract. There were 5217 open contracts at this strike prior to today, and today 4158 contract(s) were bought and sold. 
• Regarding MU (NASDAQ:<a class="ticker" href="https://www.benzinga.com/stock/MU#NASDAQ">MU</a>), we observe a put option sweep with bullish sentiment. It expires in 43 day(s) on July 18, 2025. Parties traded 36 contract(s) at a $110.00 strike. This particular put needed to be split into 7 different trades to become filled. The total cost received by the writing party (or parties) was $33.4K, with a price of $925.0 per contract. There were 6918 open contracts at this strike prior to today, and today 2738 contract(s) were bought and sold. 
• For AVGO (NASDAQ:<a class="ticker" href="https://www.benzinga.com/stock/AVGO#NASDAQ">AVGO</a>), we notice a call option sweep that happens to be bullish, expiring in 15 day(s) on June 20, 2025. This event was a transfer of 249 contract(s) at a $290.00 strike. This particular call needed to be split into 20 different trades to become filled. The total cost received by the writing party (or parties) was $89.9K, with a price of $359.0 per contract. There were 2883 open contracts at this strike prior to today, and today 2700 contract(s) were bought and sold. 
Options Alert Terminology 
 - Call Contracts: The right to buy shares as indicated in the contract. 
 - Put Contracts: The right to sell shares as indicated in the contract. 
 - Expiration Date: When the contract expires. One must act on the contract by this date if one wants to use it. 
 - Premium/Option Price: The price of the contract. 
For more information, visit our <a href="https://pro.benzinga.com/blog/how-to-understand-option-alerts/">Guide to Understanding Options Alerts</a> or read <a href="https://www.benzinga.com/markets/options">more news on unusual options activity</a>. 
This article was generated by Benzinga's automated content engine and reviewed by an editor.

AVGO

CRWV

FSLR

MSTR

NVDA

PLTR

PSTG

WULF

10 Information Technology Stocks Whale Activity In Today's Session

Macro Economic Events

Fed's Harker Says Amid Uncertainty, Fed Must Wait And See On Next Policy Steps; Entirely Possible Fed May Face Rising Inflation And Unemployment At Same Time; Slow Disinflation By Itself Justifies Fed Holding Steady On Interest Rates; Still No Idea How Shifting Economic Policies Will Affect Economy; U.S. Economy Resilient But There Are Stresses In Foundation

Morgan Stanley analyst Simeon Gutman maintains Dollar Tree (NASDAQ:<a class="ticker" href="https://www.benzinga.com/stock/DLTR#NASDAQ">DLTR</a>) with a Equal-Weight and raises the price target from $80 to $96.

DLTR

Morgan Stanley Maintains Equal-Weight on Dollar Tree, Raises Price Target to $96

Cannabis may be a plant, but it's not always as natural as it appears. Somewhere along the way from soil to sale, we've allowed shortcuts, synthetics, and questionable inputs to infiltrate a space rooted in wellness. The result is that today's cannabis products often fall short of the health and safety expectations that consumers and regulators are rapidly adopting.
This poses a growing challenge for an industry already under unprecedented scrutiny. Cannabis operators face increasing pressure not only to comply with evolving state standards but to anticipate federal oversight and align with best practices. In short, regulatory preparedness is no longer optional, it's an operational imperative.&nbsp;
Those of us in the industry understand the realities of commercialized cultivation and food manufacturing—how the proverbial sausage is made. We know what it takes to produce quality cannabis and how easy it is to compromise for the sake of speed, yield, and price. We've seen it all—over-fertilized crops, flavorless distillate gummies loaded with artificial dyes and colors, products that test clean only because the testing protocols were gamed.
Let's be clear:&nbsp;fast and cheap&nbsp;will always find an audience, but at what cost?&nbsp;
Recent investigations have only deepened the concerns. A December 2024&nbsp;<a href="https://www.latimes.com/california/story/2024-12-19/we-tested-cannabis-products-for-pesticides-how-dirty-is-your-weed" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">LA Times</a>&nbsp;investigation found frequent pesticide contamination in legal cannabis, as well as misleading THC claims and the presence of harmful dilution oils. These findings mirror systemic issues seen across the food and beverage sectors, where consumer demands and government action are rapidly reshaping ingredient safety standards.
In April 2025, the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services (HHS) announced a national phase-out of petroleum-based dyes by the end of 2026. These dyes face outright bans or strict restrictions in parts of Europe and, to a lesser extent, Canada. Additionally, HHS Secretary Robert F. Kennedy, Jr. has also signaled further bans on food and wellness additives that potentially pose health risks. These moves should be interpreted not as regulatory noise, but as a clear direction: consumer products must become cleaner, safer, and more transparent &#8211; cannabis products included.
So how do we clean up cannabis and ensure the entire supply chain is ready for what's coming? There are three critical areas of focus:
1. Eliminating Pesticides. Clean cannabis starts with clean cultivation. That means no synthetic pesticides, fungicides, or herbicides &#8211; period. Yet, despite state regulations, contaminated cannabis is not an anomaly—it's disturbingly common. Independent tests have found that a&nbsp;significant share&nbsp;of legal products—well over one‑quarter in some studies—carry banned pesticides. When heated, some of these chemicals can convert into harmful byproducts, including cyanide gas, and have been linked to long-term health concerns such as cancer, reproductive harm, and neurological damage.
The problem is twofold. First, enforcement is inconsistent. Second, many testing regimes can be gamed. To ensure true consumer safety, operators must move beyond checkbox compliance and insist on comprehensive CAT4 Testing, which monitors for contaminants across all phases of production: soil, water, flower, and oil. While more rigorous, this approach is essential if the industry wants to evolve from "legal" to "trusted."
2. Committing to Ingredient Transparency. Consumers are demanding labels they can understand and trust.&nbsp;That means no synthetic dyes like Red 40, Yellow 5, or Blue 1, no preservatives, and no artificial sweeteners or flavors with undisclosed chemical compositions.&nbsp;This isn't just about health—it's a good business practice. A 2024&nbsp;<a href="https://www.innovamarketinsights.com/trends/clean-label-trends/" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">Innova Market&nbsp;</a>insight report found that 66% of consumers are influenced by clean label products and 50% of consumers say they would pay more for clean labels.&nbsp;
CPG giants like Nestlé S.A. (NSRGY) and General Mills Inc. (GIS) are already reformulating their products to meet growing consumer demand for transparency and clean ingredients. Cannabis companies will need to follow suit—not just to maintain compliance, but to earn consumer trust and secure shelf space in an increasingly competitive market. At KANHA, the company I lead, we prioritize CAT4 testing and use real fruit, plant-based colorants, and minimal processing to ensure product integrity. Brands like Autumn Brands are leading with regenerative agriculture and sustainable cultivation practices, while Papa &amp; Barkley is known for its clean, solventless extraction methods that preserve the full spectrum of the plant. These purpose-driven approaches don't just appease regulators—they resonate with consumers and foster long-term brand loyalty in a wellness-driven economy.
For consumers using cannabis for sleep, anxiety, or chronic pain, there is an implicit trust in the safety of what they&#8217;re consuming. Violating that trust puts not just individual brands, but the integrity of the entire industry at risk.
3. Prioritizing Biocompatibility in Formulations.&nbsp;Biocompatibility is just a fancy way of saying that ingredients and additives should work in harmony with the body, not against it. This principle should include everything from emulsifiers and terpenes to flavoring agents.&nbsp;
Unfortunately, many current formulations rely on additives that may be technically permitted, but biologically disruptive. Take propylene glycol, a common vape ingredient linked to respiratory and organ toxicity when inhaled at vaping temperatures. Or titanium dioxide, which is still used in some gummies and topicals and has been flagged as a potential carcinogen. Even PEGs and synthetic stabilizers have been known to disrupt gut health and trigger inflammatory responses in animal studies.
As evidence mounts, regulators will inevitably respond. Brands that proactively replace these additives with plant-derived binders, gut-safe stabilizers, and clean emulsification methods will be better positioned to meet new compliance thresholds and avoid costly reformulations down the line.
<figure class="wp-block-image size-large is-resized"><img loading="lazy" decoding="async" width="731" height="1024" src="https://contributor-assets.benzinga.com/wp-content/uploads/2025/06/05154451/KANHA-1-731x1024.jpg" alt="" class="wp-image-13963" style="width:321px;height:auto" srcset="https://contributor-assets.benzinga.com/wp-content/uploads/2025/06/05154451/KANHA-1-731x1024.jpg 731w,https://contributor-assets.benzinga.com/wp-content/uploads/2025/06/05154451/KANHA-1-214x300.jpg 214w,https://contributor-assets.benzinga.com/wp-content/uploads/2025/06/05154451/KANHA-1-768x1075.jpg 768w,https://contributor-assets.benzinga.com/wp-content/uploads/2025/06/05154451/KANHA-1.jpg 857w" sizes="(max-width: 731px) 100vw, 731px" /><figcaption class="wp-element-caption">Inside KANHA's manufacturing facility</figcaption></figure>
Building Towards a Clean Cannabis Standard
The movement towards cleaner cannabis is not just ethical—it's a matter of resilience, reputation, and risk management. Trust is currency. In a category as heavily scrutinized as ours, cleaning up cultivation and product formulation today will help future-proof businesses against tomorrow's oversight. It can also reduce exposure to legal liabilities, costly product recalls, and irrevocable reputational damage. With class action law firms increasingly targeting companies for mislabeling, false advertising, or contamination issues, getting ahead of these risks now could help operators avoid expensive litigation later. Truth in labeling is no longer just a compliance checkbox, it's a frontline defense against the next wave of lawsuits.&nbsp;
If the wellness economy is the future of cannabis, as many believe, then aligning with the highest food and health standards is the only viable path forward. We've seen this before in other sectors. Clean-label beauty, once a fringe trend, is now table stakes for prestige skincare. Organic and non-GMO certifications helped natural food brands like Annie's and KIND reshape grocery store shelves. Cannabis can follow a similar arc if the industry chooses to lead rather than react.
At this critical inflection point, the question is no longer&nbsp;whether&nbsp;the cannabis supply chain will be cleaned up but&nbsp;how soon. The companies that invest in safety, transparency, and biocompatibility now will be the ones best positioned to thrive in the federally regulated future ahead.
<figure class="wp-block-image"><img decoding="async" src="https://ssl.gstatic.com/ui/v1/icons/mail/images/cleardot.gif" alt="" /></figure>

Comments

China SXT Pharmaceuticals

China SXT Pharmaceuticals (SXTC) Options

No option chain data available. Please try again later

Notizie

PARTENAIRE / CONTRIBUTEUR

BENZINGA MONDIAL